New sociological theory: Dr. Fatih Kaya develops a third logic of social action with "Mediodoxy"

The study focuses on the question of how symbolic violence and social power relations are not only reproduced through open consent or resistance, but also through ambivalent, everyday practices. To this end, Dr. Kaya analyzed 23 qualitative interviews with Jewish and Muslim people who have had anti-Semitic or anti-Muslim racist experiences.
The essay shows that social inequalities are often stabilized in an intermediate area: not by explicitly defending discriminatory practices, but also not by radically rejecting them. Dr. Kaya refers to this intermediate form of practice as "mediodoxy". This refers to habitualized forms of silence, silent consent, normalization or the unintentional reproduction of social inequality. Using empirical interview sequences, the study reconstructs how patterns of interpretation, semantics and actions that generate inequality can also be unintentionally reproduced by those affected themselves, for example through everyday language practices, the relativization of discriminatory jokes or situational forms of adaptation.

The analysis does not identify these dynamics in terms of individual psychology, but rather as an expression of symbolic power relations and habitualized social orders. With the concept of mediodoxy, Dr. Kaya expands the Bourdieusian field and habitus theory with a previously untheorized intermediate logic. The essay argues that social domination is not only reproduced at the poles of orthodoxy and heresy, but in particular in the ambivalent everyday life of social practice.
The article is in the tradition of praxeological social theory and reconstructive social research, and at the same time makes a fundamental theoretical contribution to research into anti-Semitism, racism and inequality."
About ASA
Sociological Theory is the theoretical flagship journal of the American Sociological Association (ASA) and is one of the most renowned journals in the field internationally. In the current Journal Citation Reports ranking, the journal is ranked 5th out of 220 journals in the Sociology category.
The journal also has an extremely selective review process: The rejection rate is regularly over 90 percent, while the acceptance rate is around 9 percent. Typically, only around 16 to 20 manuscripts are accepted for publication each year, out of well over 150 submissions.


